Privacy is front and center at CES as professionals dispute essential concerns in the information economy

Personal privacy specialists speak at CES2020 From left: Moderator Rajeev Chand, Partner and Head of Research at Wing Venture Capital; Erin Egan, VP Public Law and Chief Privacy Officer for Policy at Facebook; Jane Horvath, Senior Director, Global Privacy at Apple; Susan Shook, Global Privacy Officer at The Procter & Gamble Company; and Rebecca Massacre, FTC Commissioner. (GeekWire Image/ Kevin Lisota)

The annual Customer Electronic devices Program in Las Vegas is viewed by numerous as the pulse of the technology industry. The issues checked out by speaker sessions, and the most recent gadgets unveiled on the showroom floor, offer insights into the state of technology and where it’s headed.

As public awareness of the huge data economy grows, personal privacy and surveillance are essential problems at CES this year. There are more than a lots privacy-themed sessions this week.

Tuesday’s Chief Personal privacy Officer Roundtable was among the most buzzed-about sessions– in part since of the involvement of long time CES no-show Apple.

Apple’s senior director of global privacy, Jane Horvath rested on the panel along with Facebook’s chief personal privacy officer for policy Erin Egan; Proctor & Gamble’s worldwide personal privacy officer, Susan Shook; and Rebecca Slaughter, commissioner on the Federal Trade Commission.

The four privacy specialists had a dynamic dispute on among the most discussed and confounding difficulties for the technology market. Check out highlights from the panel below and take a look at all of our CES protection here

Facebook on the defensive

Egan fielded some of the most challenging questions because of the data privacy concerns that have actually dogged Facebook given that the 2016 Cambridge Analytica scandal. The business has actually carried out changes since that breach, in which the information company was able to use info on Facebook users to push political programs without their understanding.

But the company is still in the hot seat. Facebook got the toughest personal privacy penalty the FTC has ever imposed last year, though numerous, including Massacre, stated it didn’t go far enough.

Facebook privacy lead Erin Egan. (GeekWire Image/ Kevin Lisota)

When asked about Facebook’s information collection practices, Egan went on the defensive.

” I take genuine concern with the idea with what we do at Facebook, the marketing that we serve, is in some way surveying people,” she stated.

Egan didn’t back down later on when continued whether Facebook collects too much personal data on its users.

” We are not,” she stated. “We comply with the concept of data reduction. We gather what we require to serve people. We give people control and option over that information, and we’re clear with individuals about it, and we work to de-identify.”

Zeroing in on place information

Investigative reporting over the previous few months has actually revealed how pervasive, and sometimes insidious, location information sharing has actually become. The current report to make waves can be found in the kind of a New york city Times job called One Nation, Tracked

The Times discovered one of many datasets with particular location information on countless Americans. The tracking was so exact, Times press reporters could determine trips that looked a lot like adulterous affairs and task interviews with contending companies.

Inquired about the report, Proctor & Gamble’s Shook stated not all place information sharing is dubious.

” You can have place data that’s being utilized at macro levels,” she said. Her firm may gather zip code information in order to find females living in damp environments who may be susceptible to marketing for humidity-fighting hair products.

Slaughter countered:

How does a customer understand that P&G is doing exactly what it says with its information when a lot of what takes place in data sharing goes on in this opaque facilities behind the scenes? Area information is definitely extremely sensitive information that benefits certain types of protection. The problem … that the short article highlighted is de-identification is only significant if data can not be re-identified.

The year of monitoring tech and personal privacy

The concentrate on information personal privacy at CES this year reflects growing concern among customers about how their information is collected and used. A parallel– or possibly paradoxical– pattern is also playing out this year.

Security tech is all over CES, as AP reports Smart home devices, deal with scanning, DNA testing, and other tech that improves our capability to gather details on one another is all over the showroom floor.

Ring’s cubicle at CES2020 (GeekWire Picture/ Taylor Soper)

Amazon-owned Ring is leading the pack. The maker of smart house security cameras and doorbells has a huge existence at CES this year. Ring unveiled brand-new privacy defenses ahead of the event, following incidents in which hackers got into clients’ cams and pestered them. Numerous impacted customers submitted a claim recently against Amazon looking for class action status.

However interest for tracking tech does not seem to be equally exclusive with personal privacy concerns, as Egan showed throughout the privacy panel.

” As all of us understand, the landscape is evolving,” she said. “For instance, I got this remarkable Ring doorbell system. I’m here at CES. It’s a snow day back in D.C. I have no concept who’s going to concern the door when my kids are house, and I can see that. That’s hugely, hugely important, but the question is, what do people expect … about how their information is being gathered and utilized? That’s something that is hard, which’s something that’s going to take consistent work to make certain that individuals understand what we’re gathering, and how we’re using their data.”

Read More